Good from a lie


Mike Daisey’s account of working conditions at Foxconn in China was clearly meant to shock the American public.  And it worked.  But after listening to the retraction TAL, I almost feel stupid for believing that things could be as miserable as Daisey described.  While there could obviously be improvements, the retraction episode showed numerous fabrications and inaccuracies’.  While all were important, the error that struck me the most involved underage workers.

 

While TAL was obviously at fault for not following through on Daisey’s translator, I don’t think any of us were suspicious when we heard about 12 and 13 year olds working in factories.  I know I have heard numerous horror stories about child labor throughout the world, so this just seemed like another example.  But the reason it struck me the most was that I believe this was Daisey’s main moral, human shot at Apple.  Child labor evokes strong emotions from the American public, because we have checks that protect children.  Daisey knew this would strike almost any type of person listening, and it’s what damages his credibility the most.

 

Jordi asked the question of whether or not you can fact check the fact checker, and I think the retraction podcast proves you can.  My dad works in newspapers, and he knows that a rule of thumb for most news sources is 2 or more sources prior to printing.  TAL didn’t do it’s job, but that’s not to say that nothing good came from Daisey’s monologue.  It prompted Apple to investigate the claims, and together with the Fair Trade Association has significantly improved conditions.  The state has agreed to cut hours by one third by 2013, showing that good can come from a lie

Advertisements

One response to “Good from a lie

  1. I have a slight problem with what you said about This American Life in the last paragraph. In the episode “Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory”, Ira Glass states that weeks were spent going over the information in Daisey’s performance. They tried to have both Apple and Foxconn come on the show to refute Mike’s comments. Both companies turned down the offer. Most people interpret refusing to defend your company almost as an admission of guilt. With firsthand accounts being the only source of information and nobody refuting the evidence, the show becomes easy to believe. Yes, the people at This American Life did miss the gaping hole in Daisey’s story, but they still tried to do their job and present accurate information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s