When listening to The Retraction of Mike Daisey, I found the episode to be gratifying yet somewhat insensitive. Within his monologue of the Apple factory, Mike Daisey exaggerates and fabricates the truth regarding various topics such as: businessman he had met, his encounter with factory workers, and conversations with his translator, etc. For the producers to feel manipulated on This American Life is completely understandable and I agree with their decision to create a retraction episode. However, I feel a sense of severity in the way they went about questioning Mike Daisey. I understand that his fraudulent misrepresentation not only effects this radio show, but the livelihood of many Apple affiliates yet, I feel the point he was trying to make was to cause a public reaction – which he did. His exaggerations may have been inaccurate, but his message was inhuman treatment of factory workers and people took notice. Although wronged, This American Life employees could have handled the situation in a more amiable manor.

On the other hand, I feel that Mike Daisey handled his confrontation tastelessly. He never admits to lying; he instead deflects the fraudulent statements onto everyone but himself. He continuously claims his monologue was created in a “theatrical context” but he never prefaces his dishonesty in his performances. The way in which he approaches the situation tarnishes his monologue; if he had been more compliant of his fraudulence, his monologue could still hold some substance.

With that being said, the fact checks in the episode weren’t 100% accurate, defiling some of their credibility as well. At one point within The Retraction Episode, the producer and one of his affiliates discuss the fabrication of child labor in Mike Daisey’s encounter. They modify his encounter and respond that Apple has rare incidences of child labor. They then address the actions Apple has taken to eliminate all child labor occurrences within their factories.

This VentureBeat article describes how this past year, child labor is not necessarily being witnessed however, government personnel fear that underage laborers are still being hid from factory inspections. The Inquirer posted a similar article, discussing how Apple found 5 factories using solely child labor. These articles were published nearly 2 years after Mike Daisey’s first episode was aired; 2 years is too long for these issues to still be occurring. In all, Apple may believe factory conditions are improving, but I remain unconvinced and hesitant of their child labor ‘clean-up’.



2 responses to “Hesitant

  1. I too felt very bothered by the way Mike Daisey answered the questions concerning his legitimacy. He could not admit to lying, but instead tried to justify himself in every fabrication or exaggeration he made. I thought he also aimed to make the retraction very theatrical by imputting long pauses and drawn out replies where he refuses to directly answer the questions asked.I agree that his attempt to create a stir and public awareness was acheived, however I do not think he had the right to make those fabrications and then go on This American Life.
    I also liked your research on the improvements to child labor and I too am sceptical as to how much is actually being done and how long the improvements will last. I think that companies will only go so far to make significant changes and if workers keep showing up, the cycle will be hard to break.

  2. Pingback: Third Blog Post- Useful Interruptions « Business, Society, and Government 4·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s