Does A Politically Correct Society Mean the Issue is Solved?

This Thanksgiving break I was dropping a friend off at Newark International Airport. On my way home the GPS directed me into the heart of Newark for a streetlight filled 45-minute ride home. I found myself stopped at a light when two middle aged men walked past my car. One was a Caucasian and the other African American. Without thinking, I immediately hit the lock button on my car. I stared at the light and when it turned green I zoomed off in the direction of my safe suburban town. Reflecting back on this experience, I find it to be very interesting and telling. Why did I lock my doors? Was it because I was in Newark? Was it because I was a women alone in a car? Was it because of the two men outside? Was it a combination? Would I have done the same thing if I was in my town?

In a public setting I would consider myself a pretty accepting and unbiased individual. However in this private experience I acted in the opposite manner. Part of my reaction was most likely based on the fact I was in the heart of Newark, which statistically is not the safest place. Newark is also home to many lower income individuals, and a melting pot of ethnicities and nationalities. Therefore my knowledge of social class may have impacted my action. Another dimension was the fact that I was a woman by myself and there were two men outside my car. Had it been an older women walking past my car I am not sure I would have reacted the same way. Does this mean I think women are weak and all men are bad? No. But my action clearly showed some concern to gender. It’s hard to admit, but my actions were based on some engrained preconception and bias about identity.

In today’s public setting individuals are very conscious of being “politically correct.” No one wants to offend any other identity and we make sure to avoid any topic or comment that might make us look ignorant or offensive. Is this good? I am not sure it is. I believe there is a problem when people avoid these conversations in order to skirt the issue. The reason progress was made in this country was due to the fact questions were asked and awareness grew. Conversations were started and more acceptance and learning followed. Just because we are publicly politically correct does not mean the issue is solved. There is still “isms”, stereotypes and biases in society, albeit they may be more hidden and private than before. We cannot assume that there is no longer an issue; we must continue the conservation. Even if we believe progress has been made, there is always a new wrinkle to identity. First it was class, next race, and then gender. Today I argue it is sexuality. Identity is complex and the only way to educate and build acceptance is to start a conversation. This is the only way to learn.


4 responses to “Does A Politically Correct Society Mean the Issue is Solved?

  1. I have to admit I do the same thing when I’m driving through sketchy neighborhoods or I see a man walking in the direction of my car. While I’d love to believe everyone is good, the reality is that men do attack women and people do get robbed in high-crime areas. I realize that it is possible to be attacked by a woman or in a nice neighborhood but those aren’t the types of incidents you hear about on the news everyday. We can change the way we talk about different groups but our own perceptions are ingrained in us through experiences.

  2. The idea of continuing the conversation even though it is not as apparent as it use to be is a really interesting thought. I do agree with you in some senses that since there are still many overt -isms out there we should keep the conversation going so that we can ultimately get rid of it all together. At the same time though I feel like it’s almost human nature to react in certain situations like the one you were in without it meaning an -ism was present. I think your first analysis that Newark is statistically not the safest area was very plausible and one of our natural instincts is to protect ourselves. Regardless, you brought up a great topic and discussion!

    On this topic, I know of a really interesting Youtube video of an interview with Morgan Freeman about this topic and he strictly just says to “stop talking about it.” Here it is if you’re interested:

  3. I’ve found myself doing the same thing before too and I completely agree with you in the sense that I would say in public I am pretty unbiased and accepting but have found myself doing the exact opposite in certain situations when I am by myself. It definitely is something that is engrained in our perceptions about race and gender and no matter how many steps society take in becoming more politically correct, it’s definitely not something that I don’t think is close to being resolved.

  4. No. It does not to answer your question. As I mentioned in Lindsey’s post, I can’t tell you not to lock your doors or be aware of real, if small, concerns over safety.

    At the same time, the men you KNOW are far,far, far more likely to be a source of harm. The problem is, metaphorically and literally, you can’t lock the doors. They are already in the car. And even those men are a small minority of all men.

    But women should not “have to” live under a cloud of perpetual fear. That can not be, in my mind, an acceptable existence in a society of life and liberty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s